The game of chess is EASILY solved if you look
at diminishing the number of playing pieces
on the board instead of wasting time and computative power
From a dialogical perspective
this would be like reducing the weapons
or argumentative dynamics involved in ANY disagreement
so that the two principles, the two kings,
can sit down person-to-person
and speak from the essential or true self
rather than from the ego or the confused
emotionally reactive mind (weaponry).
No one can win an argument, ever.
If two or more people UNDERSTAND each other
then there is mutual understanding
which in the case of a chess game
would be a draw with ONLY
the two kings left on the board.
[please also reference the Anything Is Possible PROOF explanation]